FFS you’re just cherry picking your way through anything anyone says.

Argue anyone’s whole comment in context or just go be a fanboy. You don’t really mind if you don’t like it but you’re retorts are weak.

The first three statements in my post support the fourth. Just because you don’t like my conclusion doesn’t make it unreasonable.

From the light details in the article, here’s what’s not in question: He came on to his nanny. He came on to his fan. Two separate unrelated people. They are both half his age. They both have unsubstantiated but like stories.

Now any of three things could be lies or deceptions or something else. That’s why if he has something to say he deserves to be heard.

We don’t have any form of denial from his side. No claims of I don’t know these people or you don’t have all the facts. No statements of collusion. I would assume his lawyer said don’t say anything. Well this is fine and does not make him guilty it also doesn’t give us even the slightest indication that any of this is a fabrication.

The next problem is when I say it’s reasonable that is my subjective opinion. If you know him and have a long personal knowledge of his history maybe you have a different opinion than me.

Based on the information that’s brought forward substantiated and unsubstantiated I’m saying that this is a reasonable and likely direction that this will head. That is unless they settle out of court and what you won’t hear about it again.

Two separate unrelated people.

Both in their twenties

Invites them into second/third base consensual relations and then it turns into rough sex.

I think that it’s an absolutely reasonable assumption that he is into younger women and doesn’t stop after he gets the green light.

But the article is light on details, and he at least deserves to have his say in court over it.

They’re only allowed to have 7.62 cm, so from a legal standpoint it’s almost twice the legal limit.

If the law doesn’t make sense you don’t challenge it by breaking it.

The police don’t carry guns there so yeah they’re concerned.

Running around twirling a clearly illegal item in public is pretty good logical grounds for police intervention. If the law says 3 in when do you actually stop them is it 4, 10, 12? If he was just transporting it from one house to another they might have let it go. But he’s walking around fidgeting twirling it in the open. I suspect he was performing twirls and dagger tricks. So the general public is probably also a little concerned. If he’s walking around his neighborhood twirling it around all the time it might even been a neighbor that called the police on it.

The fine is reasonable, getting locked up for 4 months is probably a bit much.

True, I’d still give them partial credit for the dumb statement.

Law says you can’t carry a knife bigger than 3 in. He carries a knife twice that size.

Does he carry concealed in his pocket?

No, He’s walking around carrying it openly pretending he’s a blade master, oh sorry that’s he claims it’s a fidget toy.

4 months in jail seems a bit excessive, but when the law says don’t carry a weapon and you carry a weapon…

No choice. If only one side is violent, the other side will lose. It’s a slippery slope, but play even or lose.

My thoughts exactly.

Also nothing is stopping someone from forking an open browser and throwing money/bodies at keeping it up.

It’s be a shame to lose free updates, but certainly not undoable.

Biden can do whatever he wants now right?

Approaching 50, use SUS regularly, skibidi usage is dropping off, I’m aware of rizz but don’t really use it.

That may be a better way to weed boomers from Gen X. Especially SUS, among us had a very wide appeal to multiple age ranges.

Price wise, that’s a lot less than I expected

No, I’d have accepted too expensive as an answer. They were ready to die on the hill that no one could possibly create a new browser from specs.

It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out. I’ve had more than a handful of people bitching at me that it’s impossible to make a new, open web browser in this day.

You’re right, better to pick some battles and live another day to do something good.

The IA needs to lay low a bit before we loose them. There’s plenty of stuff out there they can archive that we need that won’t piss off copyright.

We need an ipfs or torrent library that’s out of easy reach of the courts.

I think bi-partisan challenging of opinion pieces containing verifiable falsehoods is a pretty healthy idea for the public.

Yeah, My volt battery is in the floor of the trunk. If the battery on the volt dies you can’t open the trunk easily. Physical locks in the doors are no problem but they didn’t put a keyhole on the damn trunk.

You can pop the hood and access the jump terminals and then pop the trunk. You can also crawl into the back hatch from inside pull a panel off and pop the trunk.

Yeah Netflix has to pay for edge connections in major ISPs, and host cash is in places.

Yeah that’s kind of the direction I was thinking. I really want to have access to the screen and the touch controls on the shows though. It’ll all come in time.

There’s another really wicked side project I saw running on pis. You put a Bluetooth enabled device in every room and it tracks where your items are. So you could ask where your keys aren’t to triangulate which room in your house they were in.

Filebot a piece of software, it looks up your files on TMDB and themoviedb and renamese your files based on those lookups. Plex takes that naming very very well. We really need jellyfin to work with it too.