![](/static/1eaaef6e/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
You know the kind of research result where you go: “Well, no shit sherlock!” ?
This is the diametrical opposite of that…
You know the kind of research result where you go: “Well, no shit sherlock!” ?
This is the diametrical opposite of that…
I fail to see how one impedes the other, in fact I would argue it would help her win
Okay, give me an argument why setting Fox straight will help her win the election, because just saying so isn’t an argument. I’d argue that time spent bickering ‘with Fox about Fox’ isn’t time spent getting people that wouldn’t otherwise vote for her, to vote for her. (and that, by the way, is how one impedes the other)
Why hide?
Nobody said she should hide.
You think any Fox News fanboys would be swayed by anything Kamala says?
And this is the main point: Yes actually. If she makes salient points about matters that are dear to them, something is going to gnaw eventually. Have you seen Bernie Sanders’ appearances on the network? The audience definitely seems to be on his hand some of the time, just because he points out that what they have been told on the network isn’t making sense. It can be done. A bunch of them are a lost cause for sure, but certainly she ought to be able to get some of them to vote for her, she running against Trump (for fox sake!).
Her time would be better spent attracting unregistered voters
Agreed 100%, those also watch Fox though. And Trump spouting his garbage freely on that channel without opposing voices will not make them vote for Harris.
No, what she needs to do is win this election. That’s her job, everything else (like taking entertainment corpos to task for their shady tactics) comes secondary right now.
While entertaining for us, I don’t think that’d be a wise reaction. If she wants to win, she probably also needs to sway some people that are lifetime FOX junkies. Such a reaction could have a ‘basket of deplorables’ effect (being the stone cold truth, but hardly effective)
That would be cool, like those wheelchairs they make for paralyzed dogs. Although I can’t imagine what kind of forces it would have to withstand.
It is mentioned in this article.
… would split the party (possibly irreparably)
Especially since it’s a near certainty that Trump would just continue his presidential bid (as a write-in independent if need be).
Generally speaking you vote for someone. I’m thinking they meant literally a box on the ballot:
☑️ Against trump
I’m so thankful I live in a country where 4 months is (still) believed to be a ridiculously long amount of time to campaign.
Good luck America! Please show the rest of the world you’re still capable of making sane choices.
So we just invert the logic now, right?
Make the captcha impossibly hard to get right for humans but doable for bots, and let people in if they fail the test.
Oh c’mon man how naive can you be? Between Biden fumbling through debates that should’ve been child’s play and constantly forgetting names, and this guy getting martyred for not getting shot in the face, I’m sorry to say but this race won’t even be close.
(And that VP pick? People who are going for the main attraction called Trump aren’t going to give a rats ass about the VP pick.)
Agreed - you where just trying to ram your agenda through everyone’s throat.
(that’s you, that’s how you interact. ‘Agreeing’ with people in obvious disagreement with you, thinking that drove the point home)
You’re exceptionally bad faithing this whole comment section, you that right?
Cool, cool. Now quote us some child endangerment laws.
Like arguing you had right of way from six feet under.
All I can think of is that camel, furiously trying to go through the eye of that needle.
I think they should go all in on emulating reddit. In fact, I think they should get more in line with the naming scheme of reddit, an re-rename their brand to X-it.
Wishful thinking: ✅
Factual: ❌
No, it’s your daily breakpfast.
They’re very good at making up things!