ideonek

Here’s the thing: I don’t care. I really don’t. If US can’t find some way to deal with this USA, is not a rule of law country. It’s not civilized country. It’s not western country. At least 3 out of 3 in best case scenario. Either “the people” are not in charge, or they are immoral. Every day Trump is in the white house, USA is loosing is legitimacy as first word country. I don’t care about what could be the way to stop it. The peope - the suverain - should find the way. The People either are in charge, or they are under occupation. And both cases are disgusting.

It took me so long to get this…

If trump last to the end of the term, I’m giving up on USA completely.

You’ll enjoy Spock’s “I’m the X”.

ok… but why? Loss feels like the culture eating it’s own tail.
For me loss is a Tic Tack of content: “Suggar free”, yet it’s all empty calories somehow.

Feel like we all loose.

Is this the one with hospital death comics simplified to lines and shapes? My senciere appologies for being old.

Capitan? Please help.

I’ll bite:

XLIII

This is the part that resonated with me the most as the casual user. The interface is, so confusing that the differences between various forms of chats seems deliberately unclear. And all that’s “useful” is opt-in. And Groups - most used in corporate or project setting, can’t be encrypted at all? That’s… peculiar.

Again, thanks for the eye-opener.

No, I can’t stress enough how much I appreciate it. What I do right now is sending this article with TLDR to all my friends and family.

Any advice for people that used it in the past? After reading the article, my understanding is that what was sent in “private chat” was in fact encrypted (for the most part) and can be considered secured (to the degree - something is off and, maybe we didn’t find out yet, how the encryption is compromised). But it would wise to treat all other conversations as something that is compromised. Is this a fair summary?

Well, it was obvious to you. I’m a casual user, who tries to “do his best” and consider himself “somewhat informed” - obviously not by your standard. It was all news to me, and I find tremendous value in this article.

Go for the Owls and sent the letter up with a rumor that the De-Gnoming procedure is about to start. They are not that bright. They will run down to you.

I don’t know… if only we have something like hard data from things like investing that could prove that women are better and making long-term decision and are less likely to make a rush decisions based on short-lived noise. You write like it’s something we know from at least from early 2000s. It’s not like it’s a strong and growing consensus now, right?

That’s what I heard, but, again, it’s all confusing to me as well :)

Hmm,
No idea how accurate that is - know nothing about anything, please take it into consideration - but I think this may be the case: the instance show every post from every federated instances that are subscribed by people in the instance?

If you’re on europe.pub and you subscribe to “!flippanarchy” than all people on europe.pub will gain the ability to see their post in the “all”. Until at least one person do it, it’s only “potentially” connected.

Could it be the case here?

That’s beautiful and very cool. Great work.
Did you consider adding the same grayish-blueish colors her hair have to the mist? Maybe, it would hint that this mist is in some way an aspect of her. Or that she is in some way mist-ical herself.