• 0 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 8th, 2023

help-circle
  • Maybe he is just feeding your arguments to AI and you argue with AI instead of him. 😁

    But yes. As others have stated, you argue opinions. Not facts. And neither of you is really correct. You value different things. For example he values progress more than authors copyrights. And I find his points you mentioned valid. As are yours.

    I however believe, you can agree on any topic with a “smart/sane enough” person with “enough time/motivation” and “similar enough values” as you if you are also such a person.

    In that case one or the other will change his mind.

    Those conditions are rarely met and the most important part is you also have to be open to changing your mind.






    1. Optimistic person. And if saying “this idea might just work” encourages people you love to try things, then it also helps people you love.
    2. We could debate on what “overly” means. If you believe you will win the lottery this is just stupid and naive, but if you believe you can start a profitable restaurant this is not overly optimistic. Still you must not be stupid when trying.
    3. This is debatable. This statement is very broad.
    4. Correct if you are realistic and not pessimistic. My hot take should be formed: “People who claim are realists are most often just pessimists, who will pass all ideas as bad”. Actually to continue from here we should exactly define all the words we are using. And in this case it would not be a hot take anymore. Also I believe to decide to try and take interview you must feel optimistic about it instead of pessimistic.

    My hot take is targeting “realists” who say: “Your idea is bad. Do not pursue it. I am just being realistic.” Even though their idea has maybe small but fair chance of succeeding. This is just discouragement - which is more often seen in pessimists.

    Actually at this point I do not even know enough about words and definitions to continue.

    I think we should actively try to encourage each other to act, also by believing in others ideas (still do not believe in winning the lottery).




    1. I like useful delusions.
    2. If you are optimistic for others you ancourage them to do stuf. Doing some stuff that may not work is 100000% better than watching Netflix/TV. Especially in current nihilistic social climate.
    3. Pessimist and optimist are both right (not my quote)
    4. Example: Pessimist: I will not get this job -> So I will not even apply -> 0% chance of getting a job -> 100% correct Optimist: I will get this job -> I apply and prepare -> 20% chance of getting this job -> 20% correct But who cares if you are correct. What matters is taking a chance. This comes way more useful if you are optimistic every day. So you apply for a job whenever there is a chance. And if you apply for 10 jobs from initial 20% you get 89% chance to get a good job.

    Being naive is not the same as being optimistic.