image

A lazy cat in human skin, an eldritch being borne of the '90s.

Alts: @fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Bots: @SciBot@mander.xyz

  • 765 Posts
  • 149 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 14th, 2023










  • Haha, well it isn’t that simple. I use them more for the humanities to condense complex topics down to major principles. We also use them as teaching tools, for people that likely won’t continue in academia. The big problem with these tends to be in the harder sciences, unfortunately. There are some journals which are extremely trustworthy for them due to the process of submissions, like Annual Reviews. These ones tend to be invite only though. Lots of people use systematic reviews as lit reviews too to launch off their own work and identify gaps. But you are not wrong; the issue is with junk science, and I would also like to soapbox here about the lack of education, even in graduate schools, on how to identify journal trustworthiness & prestige.