![](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/86f958b1-c407-43fc-bc06-8d9ea53753f9.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Wasn’t one of the points of the book that the Voight-Kampff might not necessarily be infallible?
Wasn’t one of the points of the book that the Voight-Kampff might not necessarily be infallible?
To support our independent journalism, buy our reasonably priced fentanyl.
Are you mocking my efforts of pasting random links into an app and pressing a button? Appalling.
They do very little visually interesting stuff with their normal news coverage, but their special reports tend to be quite visually interesting.
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/
Oh, also, you’re welcome. If I do come across something I find interesting I generally try to remember to post it to lemmy, because I feel that we really can use the content.
I honestly don’t see much difference between this stance and saying that the years of oppression by Israel justify the attacks by hamas.
I think the only thing we can do here is agree that we very fundamentally disagree.
Yeah, the thing is, it seems like it’s not “oh no, they’re using human shields, we can’t blow them up”, but more like “human shields? Oh well, load the bombs.”
The atrocities commited by hamas in no way justify the atrocities commited under the leadership of the Israeli government, doubly so since an organised military force with a clear chain of command is quite different from a group of extremist militants.
That’s a whole lot of words to say almost nothing.
I’d go in a different direction - requiring someone to sing your national anthem is wrong. It’s wrong when the U.S. do it, it’s wrong when Canada does, it’s wrong when China does it.
I find national pride hard to understand, but forced displays of national pride are really iffy.
I wouldn’t even say that. Even if they had a truly unique LLM that ran partially locally with a custom co-processor, Android might still have been a good choice. It’s just hard to beat an open source base that’s already compatible with most mobile hardware, and relatively easy to find Devs for.
Using Android as a base was honestly the most reasonable thing they did. No reason to reinvent the wheel. What they made with it is admittedly really shit, though.
Huh, I’ve been in that train. Sudden, random hit of Nostalgia.
I trust Reuters more than I trust Media Bias Fact Check. I of course still vary my media diet, but they’re certainly a pillar of it.
Seem to remember that they had a big scandal with a climate change denier editor that changed some articles a few years ago. Good to remember that no oragnisation is above scrutiny.
Yup, supported ours in the recent EU election. Got booted out, sadly. Feel we could have used them in the face of chat control and other attempts at passing surveillance laws.