• 0 Posts
  • 6 Comments
Joined 12 days ago
cake
Cake day: October 5th, 2024



  • If so, then here’s my opinion: If you own or manage a shop, bar, club, gym, etc., it’s reasonable to ban someone because they aren’t the sort of person you want in your establishment. Maybe they make you or your other customers uncomfortable.

    I disagree with this specific aspect. I believe there should be reasons required to ban someone. Not just because you own the place and don’t want them in your place as they make you/other customers uncomfortable.

    As you state above, we have had to add protections for certain groups in the past as this is literally the justification for segregation in the past. But it’s still relevant as it’s the reason homeless people (for example) en masse aren’t allowed in public places in the present, even if they’re good people who have done nothing wrong. We also see it being abused with the allowance of a few “good ones” from said protected class to avoid discrimination claims while still discriminating against the rest of said class.




  • The social contract

    and the knowledge that it isn’t acceptable

    Rapists, well known followers of social contract who only do things that are acceptable…

    It’s not concerning at all that this didn’t seem immensely silly and wrong when you typed it…

    and any women inside would likely scream

    Because if a bathroom allows trans women, women will then be unable to scream while facing an attempted rape?

    the man would be perceived as an attempted rapist and would face consequences.

    Are you advocating that any man who even accidentally enters a woman’s restroom startling a woman be declared an attempted rapists?

    Otherwise, they will be considered an attempted rapist whether trans and allowed in the bathroom or not…when they start doing the attempted rape…