It’s all child safety, yet you can’t grasp that?

Last message.

Child locks are so children can’t open the door and fall out of a moving vehicle, Tesla’s emergency release overrides said child lock. If it was easily accessible a child could use it and fall out of moving vehicle still. So hence why it’s not an easily accessible handle. Since doing that would endanger children in more situations… you’re a bloody moron if you can’t comprehend this.

Hence why it’s marginally hard to access… so it’s not randomly pulled.

Got it yet? Or do you need some diagrams? Because that’s too much work.

And? A child can be locked in the back of any vehicle with no way out, atleast teslas have a way to still get out… leave it on, and no law an adult is locked back there, with no override to get out. And that’s your Honda, not even a fancy electric car….

The point is, they’re crying about children being locked in the back, yet any current vehicle you’ve been able to chose to do that for bloody decades already, yet a car with a feature to overcome that is being decried. You were locked in the back of your parents car, it’s unsafe for children to be able to open doors while driving, so it’s prevented for their safety.

The hypocrisy that people show just to be mad at something with one actually comprehending why…

Sure I have, and adults can be locked in the back of a normal car with zero way out.

Yet you want to argue that a hard to access release is bad…?

When this problem in a worse way has already ex is Ted for decades…?

Childlocks have zero override, and Teslas do, and yet the argument is child safety…? It’s unsafe for children to be able to open doors while driving, so it’s prevented for their safety. So now there is conflicting safety laws…… you didn’t see that coming now did you? Yeah…

Yes I know it overrides it… that’s not the argument. The argument was, children could be back there, it’s a stupid argument since you can lock them in the back to ANY vehicle, (but Tesla as you stupidly pointed out to ruin your own argument….), so to cry the children can’t find it… is the stupidest fucking argument that could be used to decry this…

Do you need this explained again? Or can you finally comprehend why the argument about children is a red herring?

Trunks don’t have a manual release in the back…. That why they require one…. If they had a manual handle, they wouldn’t require the other handle. As you said hardback don’t need one, why? Because you can crawl into the front where you have access to a manual handle.

You seem to know the rules, but not why, yet you insult that I shouldn’t be in safety? Maybe you should comprehend the rules instead of just knowing them, massive difference and you’ve shown your massively lacking surface knowledge while defending “children could be back there). You know wheee they can be locked in with no escape in ANY OTHER VEHILCE… lmfao you’re not very bright dude.

But I’m done explaining simple things to someone who can only argue, the children!!! While missing the entire point….

deleted by creator

You should NEVER have an adult in the back with the child lock on… since they couldn’t escape in an emergency….

Normal vehicles don’t have a bypass, so an adult would be locked in any vehicle if it was on….

Tesla’s atleast have a feature to overcome this….

It’s quite sad that you needed this explained…. Do you even own a drivers license? If you do, please turn it in for the safety of everyone on the road, not just the adults you lock in the back seat…

Yes so what difference does a hard to make emergency access do when in any normal car they can be locked in…?

It’s hard to access so kids CANT open the door while it’s moving and fall out. Thats why vehicles have the child lock feature available… it’s quite sad that you need this explained.

And the reason why it’s hard to access is so a kid can’t accidentally open it and fall out….

Having it bypass the child locks defeats the singular purpose of the child lock lmfao. What is with these arguments?

Didn’t bmw have this in the 90s…?

… the back doors that have child locks already on them so THEY CANT be opened by said children…?

That’s what argument you want to use? Seriously? Lmfao the shit people come up with sometimes.

So funnily enough, it’s plumb, level is horizontal and plumb is vertical.

That looks a Stabila level, not a cheap one to lose…

Vast majority of society does it, a small fraction make a big deal out of it, some do it behind closed doors, but to say society condemns it is just wrong, it’s only a small fraction of a over controlling corp jobs that disallow it. But what’s funny, those execs are all doing it themselves, maybe open the curtain and stop doing what a small portion of society has deemed “acceptable” for the rest of the world.

Some judges won’t care, others would love to swing their power around, you seem to be wanting to be crushed am quieted by those above you for no reason other than their own enjoyment of theirs hypocrisy over you.

Say darn, shoot, dick, dang to a judge and you can have similar results as fuck, so what’s your point here? What isn’t a cuss to you may be a cuss to someone else, yet you want a few people to be the judge of everything? Sure makes sense

Also, 1/6 of the world speaks English, you could use that exasperation in over 80% of society and no one would even know what you said…… I wonder if you realize how many people cuss in their own language that you don’t even realize or know about……

Curtesy? Dont say dang darn or shoot, theres zero difference, but it’s okay for you to have an outburst of frustration, but not for others?

Thats hella biased dude.

All outburst are either acceptable, or they aren’t, why are justifying one’s but disallowing someone else’s? For arbitrary reasons, when they can actually have valid reasons for their use, despite you not wanting to educate yourself.

This is more than about cussing, it’s about any inappropriate outburst, but of course people try to justify their own, while decrying others.

The one being biased and harassing someone for something they also do, would be the hr issue and the one up for layoffs dude, do you work in HR or something?

It’s part of my religion, are you trying to suppress my religious rights?

Or something like that, there’s always an angle to play if someone wants to be petty or want to exert their “power” over their coworkers.

Than they can fight that any outburst is unprofessional and they are being harassed for what other coworkers are doing.

Fuck Shit Damn Shoot Darn

No difference, zero, but personal offense for arbitrary reasons.

What did they do to have negative events in Canada?

Any outburst would be unprofessional, a specific word changes nothing unless directed at someone.

Than replacement words shouldn’t be acceptable either, you can either express your frustration or you can’t. A choose of word shouldn’t make a difference, it should be unprofessional to make an outburst at all if that’s the case.

Right before hitting begin the keyword. If you can stop before hitting yes that’s ideal, but in situations where it jumps out and you can’t react. Braking during impact is the worst thing you can do.

If you think I’m saying to line it up and accelerate for 200meters, I dont know what to say about that,

Conditions matter and your reaction should always be for the worst possible scenario (moose and snow), braking removes your ability to maneuver as well, and locking the brakes up which will almost always happen when you panic break, would be the worst scenario. If there’s snow or rain, braking again is right out.

If it jumps out and you can’t do anything but brake, you shouldn’t do that, you grip the wheel and maintain speed, and if you can punch the gas for the hood raise. But people panic and can’t think. So maintain speed, don’t panic and lock your brakes up.