Those are a lot of assumptions and generalizations about a very broad group of people. How does recognizing a family’s loss relate to a spouse wanting a title they haven’t earned? Feel free to keep any dumb opinions to yourself.
Those are a lot of assumptions and generalizations about a very broad group of people. How does recognizing a family’s loss relate to a spouse wanting a title they haven’t earned? Feel free to keep any dumb opinions to yourself.
‘The terrorist wrote in his letter that he was warned by an attorney and a professor “that US law permit the US President to sentence to death any federal prisonneer [sic] deem to be a threat to National security.”’
He says that the President can do this, but it’s something I’ve never heard of and I can’t find anything to back his claim up. Is this even true?
Edit: Seems like something the author should have verified as well.
Yeah, the article comes to a conclusion that directly contradicts the source they quoted.
This article is a week old.
That is quite an interesting set of political beliefs this guy has.
It could potentially work out like netflix letting users keep the discs they had.
I 100% would not want an image like that to pop up in front of a coworker. I’m on board with you, OP.
They don’t follow the grid frequency because the EU or US regulations require it, they follow the grid frequency because physics demands it.
I think that’s why they said between the maintenance cost and market price.