Okay, but if it doesn’t say “You have thirty seconds to comply” before shooting someone then what’s the point?
Okay, but if it doesn’t say “You have thirty seconds to comply” before shooting someone then what’s the point?
That friend? Albert Einstein.
I like how you put this. Anon was asked requirements and all he gave were deal-breakers. It comes off as desperate, crass, or both.
Now how much force does it require? That is up to the trigger spring. Some jurisdictions like NY force glocks to have a really heavy trigger pull but as far as I am aware there is no data supporting that it makes them any safer. I will say if I had to criticize the glock, it is that you need to pull the trigger to disassemble the weapon. Of course you should only be trying to disassemble it after you’ve cleared any rounds from the chamber but it is one minor flaw with the design and one reason why the glock wasn’t eligible to become the US Army’s sidearm.
Right? At best their argument is “I was too stupid to make the right decision for myself therefore no one should be able to make the decision for themselves”
Article says that it’s basically the equivalent of getting an image of a bottle cap on the surface of the moon from earth. At that kind of resolution the wavelength of light actually becomes a limiting factor. They’re using shorter wavelengths to get higher resolution.
Paper products, breakfast foods, candy, snacks. There, saved you a click.