They must have let people from each state make their own graph.

You’re pathetically apathetic, not fearful, congrats.

That’s not what I said. You ironically refuse the existence of the other category, lol. Freudian inspiration for that?

Your post history shows exactly what I said.

That was obvious from the get-go, but now that you’ve demonstrated evidence for why you act the way you do, it’s no longer interesting.

“Living in fear” is very different from the reality of what you argue for, which is “being apathetic to those who will suffer from the consequences of my actions”

You quoted me saying either and then didn’t include the other possibility lol… Yes, Trump voters all fit into one of those two categories, making you not much different.

Never said you didn’t live a full life, wanted praise, that you wrote the article, or that the community should censor you. Being selfish is antisocial, and you spend your whole time in here complaining that you get downvoted, dismissed wholehearted, ridiculed, interspersed with missing everyone’s points about why something is empathetic to do, and why what you spread isn’t. I don’t think you do any of that for praise, I think you either don’t have fully functional empathy or you’re too into weeds to find your way out through logic. I don’t believe you can logic anyone out of a belief if they didn’t logic their way into it and so the way they lurch back to their original nonsense is always more telling than the nonsense itself.

“I’m voting for my values, and I’m not scared of Trump. I won’t vote out of fear.” This is the epitome of privilege, and why people dislike you. I think that warrants more introspection.

[Pause for introspection]

Do other people have things to fear about his idealogy? How precisely do you suggest that they deal with that risk? If you don’t fear him and what he’ll do to you, and you don’t care what he’ll do to other people who don’t deserve it enough to lift a finger, or put your purity politics aside, then you are selfish and idiologically unfit for the 2 party system that we currently live in. A based person with your ideals would vote for what’s better based on the system we have rather than the system they want, and then lobby, call, donate, and canvas for system that they want.

So we arrive at two options, either you are a sociopath who doesn’t understand why letting bad things happen to other people is bad, or you’re incredibly uninformed about the ramnifications of your actions whether purposefully or unintentionally… or you’re an AI bot wasting everyone’s time being fed prompts by some shithead Jimmy Dore type. It doesn’t really matter because the explanation has been given to you dozens of times and you some how read enough to respond to it all and then completely miss the point about other people being important, not just yourself. Anti-social bellyaching isn’t going to get you any praise online in largely progressive circles.

Every single one stood firm about the importance of precedence, then immediately started legislating from the bench.

They will just lie to get through. It worked for his SCOTUS nominees.

I’m sure they do… doesn’t mean she gives a shit

It was a description of how calling you names won’t change your mind, but neither does pretending that you have a point. You’ve clearly turtled up because people insult you on here, but consider how else someone is supposed to get through to you when the answer of why you’re wrong is incredibly simple? You’re completely walled off from reality.

I feel like you’ve got a lot in common with Terrence Howard. Confidence galore without the basic math skills to know you’re objectively misguided. Insulting people doesn’t change any minds, but neither does coddling them, pretending they have a point.

Is this why he needs JD as an intermediary to garner the “full-throated” endorsements of the adrenochrome brothers, Peter Theil and Elon Musk?

OP ain’t beating the allegations with this thread… Never seen so much blue in the replies. Seems their primary goal is baiting people into bans. Major hallway monitor energy.

Do some soul searching and come back better. This troll thing you got going on ain’t it.

Ah good to see someone looked into it. It just struck me as odd to describe the bullet as a buzz. That’s only true for a supersonic rifle round in my experience if it’s unstable or tumbling, so if it was a ricochet or fragment from whatever else it hit. His descriptions of things aren’t exactly reliable anyways though.

A Secret service agent there said it was a piece of glass that sliced his ear which made a lot more sense with how it looks, and is in line with Trump’s retelling of the story at the RNC, (he heard a buzz go by) but it doesn’t really change anything from either side. Trump would have said Jesus personally blocked the bullet no matter what and getting hit by glass rather than a bullet doesn’t make it much less traumatic of an event to imagine for those of us with empathy.

Magically find a spine? She called for a ceasefire long before Biden during a time when his press secretary wasn’t allowed to speak that way. Kamala may not pull funding the way we’d like her to, but all evidence points to her being less forgiving of zionist warcrimes than Biden. Weighing the options and alternative realities, this timeline became much brighter the moment Biden dropped and endorsed her.

If Trump had his way with the unitary executive posture then Biden could have FEC and FCC block and confiscate all advertising effort and call it an official act, which is a presidential feature also chiseled out of the Constitution for Trump and Trump alone… Make the insult of hypocrisy great again.

It’s funny, I don’t remember a peep from Republicans about DEI for Obama choosing an old white dude as a running mate. It’s almost as if DEI is a stand-in for another word. Maybe media could do their job and posit what that word might be.

DEI is their stand in for the n word, and the only thing protecting them from backlash is their followers who need to be told “I am a racist, n-word” before it stands out as starkly more racist than themselves on a daily basis.