They need to ban it or control it to stop any more Zohrans from going viral.
They need to ban it or control it to stop any more Zohrans from going viral.
And with such extremist positions like: agreeing with the United Nations about a genocide.
shocked viewers when their screen switched to flash a message that read, “Free Palestine United Nations have called it a genocide. The BBC calls it a ‘conflict.’”
Wow how shocking. Those poor shocked viewers who were just trying to watch a nice punk show without being exposed to politics.
That would be genius. Let them yell about it in the media until everyone knows that guillotines are on the menu.
He looks TERRIBLE
You know this is what trump is most angry about.
Edit: he knows Ivanka will give him her Justin Trudeau look
Yeah, it’s going to be crazy. The scariest part is that most people communicate using platforms that (being generous) will not benefit from his policies.
I’m still optimistic they can get people hyped up for the class war.
This has to be one of the all-time great headlines.
If Mamdani loses, there’s a possibility that he could run on the Working Families Party line in the general election — though Gripper said the New York WFP has not decided whether they’ll run a candidate on their line in the general election and will make a decision after the final primary results come in.
Please do this if it comes to it.
There’s a film that covers how they named Gleemonex:
I’ve just never personally voted using RCV on a ballot that requires you to rank that many candidates for a valid ballot. That seems unnecessary.
You have to rank 5 candidates? What the hell is the reasoning behind that?
Our Current State: Consolidated
Fucking everything in this country
YOU HAVE 1 SECOND to provide COMPLETE FINANCIAL RESTORATION. ABSOLUTELY AND IRREVOCABLY FINAL OPPORTUNITY. RESTORE MY BUSINESS OR BE LEGALLY ANNIHILATED. John Johnson
All non-American citizens need to carry proof of their legal status.
Since this is illogical I guess we all know what they mean by ‘non-American citizens’.
I still regularly think about Enema Bag Jones.
The first decision has to be vim/emacs.
71 of the 76 bills that Abbott vetoed passed through both chambers with a veto-proof majority, or more than two-thirds support.
What is a veto-proof majority if he can still veto them?
It seems strange that they want to reconvene to deal with them instead of just making them actually veto-proof. I guess it’s probably about making minimal changes to the constitution.
That’s crazy.
Since GPUs got into the TFLOP range I often think of this old magazine cover:
https://images.computerhistory.org/revonline/images/500004286-03-01.jpg?w=600
The tough-on-crime people should really be pushing for the death penalty here.
This was on my mind, but then I just watched it yesterday.