If everyone instead just agreed. It wouldn’t be much of an unpopular opinion now would it?

I see. I think I’m starting to understand. It makes sense when you mention that energy has been very cheap.

Why spend money on new windows when the difference in the energy bill is just a few bucks.

Windows like we have? It’s just two panes of glass with a gap between the panes for air to act as an insulant.

Even with plastic windows, you can have two panes with a gap and it will work too.

I believe you. I just really struggle to comprehend that not being standard in parta where you get snow and cold. Or it being considered “extra”. It’s not alien technology. It’s two panes with a gap between them. That’s it.

The US. Got it. Say no more.

Yes

That’s the dumbest thing I’ve heard. The part about there not being good or bad winter drivers.

Honestly. Most of your tips sounds what someone says that was a tourist somewhere cold once in their life and now pretends to know what they’re talking about.

Sincerely. Someone born and raised in the north.

What is north for you? I see so many tips being the dumbest things I’ve ever heard of.

Like plastic wrap on your windows. Sounds like something stupid Americans does instead of buying proper insulated windows.

Not saying I’m a expert. But I am a Swede and deal with snow and cold every year.

Most people don’t like every single movie, so why do people say they like movies?

Doesn’t have to be.

It’s quite incredible how much one can manage to post when it’s your full time job

He sure was brilliant. And what was done to him is from today’s standpoint barbaric, but the notion that he alone was responsible for breaking the codes is a terrible falsehood that needs to die.

I think we can celebrate his brilliancy without discrediting everyone else that worked on the project. There’s just no need to add lies such as “single handedly”.

Can we stop the false notion that he did it on his own? It’s just not true. Not even close.

Arne Beurling however DID single-handedly Crack a T52 in 2 weeks with nothing but pen and paper.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arne_Beurling

yeah yeah, we get it, you have forgiving mothers, nice humble brag.

I did not worry every second that I allegedly am about to to live in an authoritarian state.

What are you talking about?

I’m not American, but that was fun to watch. I had my popcorn and everything. It felt like I’m watching Cartman debate Wendy or something.

Do you really believe someone who is still undecided going into last night’s debate is a reasonable person?

It’s not just about president it’s about party. Someone might not like Trump. But at the same time dislike democratic policies and democrats as a party.

So now the have to decide. Do they go against Republicans due to their candidate? Hearing Kamala debate him might convince them that yeah… ok. They’re not THAT bad… at least they (democrats) are better than him (Trump)

No. I’m really not. And as I’ve explained so many times. There are evidence available to make that conclusion plausible.

The word you are looking for is proof. But you not understanding the difference between evidence and proof is another issue.

Yikes, you really want to strawman this as hard as you can.

Not sure what you’re quoting but it ain’t me.

There is evidence to draw the conclusion that an estimate of 180k dead is plausible. Everything from the length of the war, the documented lack of aid reaching the region, the documented destruction of medical facilities to the The documented destruction of habital areas.

I understand fully that there are ~40k deaths reported from within. I think it’s entierly plausible that the real number of deaths as an indirect cause of the war are far higher than that. Personally I think it’s more than plausible. I think it’s likely. But I’ll stick with plausible just for you.

It is based on evidence.

Evidence that very little aid is reaching Gaza. Evidence that clean water is difficult to come by. Evidence that 35% of their builds are severely damaged or destroyed. Evidence from previous wars and how the population were affected by similar conditions.

With those points of data. Qualified people can make estimations of what they think the number of dead might look like.

But there is no evidence to prove the estimation is correct right until after the war is over.

What you want to say, is that there’s no proof. Which is correct. There is no proof for the figure. Because again. It’s an estimation. There is a war. We can’t go dig up the bodies just yet

Gaza had an estimated population of about 2 million people.

We know that 35% of the buildings in Gaza is severely damaged or destroyed. Very little aid is reaching their target, hospitals are destroyed.

There is nothing disingenuous about me agreeing with them that it’s plausible that an estimated number of deaths as a result from the war is up towards 180 thousand.