I have a decent 2 bay synology, but want to put all my docker images/ VMs running on a more powerful machine connected to the same LAN. Does it ever make sense to do the for media serving or will involving an extra device add too much complexity vs just serving from the NAS itself. I was hoping to have calibre/home assistant/tube type services, etc. all running off a mini PC with a Ryzen 7 and 64gb ram vs the NAS.

My Linux knowledge is intermediate; my networking knowledge is begintermediate, and I can generally follow documentation okay even if it’s a bit above my skill level.

  • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you can map a network drive (very east fstab edit BTW), then yes, its a great way to go.

    That’s what I do, I have two 5-bay NASs, both use all 4 uplinks (LAG) to my switch, and my media server is an LXC on an 8th gen intel, with GPU passthrough.

    If you reboot your nas, you may need to reconnect from the server. If you reboot your server, you dont have to do anything since its connecting when it starts up. If you end up needing more space, you just mount that new NAS alongside it.

    To me its the better approach.

    • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Commenting just to add “nofail” to the fstab.

      I didn’t do this in Proxmox and then the drive stopped working and so did Proxmox. As a noob I ended up starting fresh and losing lots.

      After adding nofail the services start up, just without the NAS attached. Without nofail it just doesn’t boot.

      Nofail for the win