• Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah, back in 2010 and before nuclear was the way to go but with the incredible advancements in solar and wind it’s no longer the best option.

    Still shame on Germany for decommissioning nuclear reactors and deciding to build Nordstream 2 and burn coal as a replacement.

    • cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      with the incredible advancements in solar and wind it’s no longer the best option.

      I haven’t heard of any advancement that makes solar generate energy when the sun doesn’t shine and wind generate energy when the wind isn’t blowing.

      • kaffiene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The wind is always blowing somewhere and overproduction is cheaper than batteries

            • fellowmortal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              No, there is pumped storage. Honestly, despite the plethora of start-ups claiming to have a solution (sodium batteries, molten-salt, etc) The only really proven way to store electricity for later is pumped storage, but that relies on geography (hills) which not everyone has. Batteries are great for phones, and cars but they simply don’t scale to countries.

                • fellowmortal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  That is actually very impressive. Thanks! I remain a bit skeptical as its only 1/5th of what they need and it’s only one region of one (rich) country. Still, 10GW of lithium battery would be one hell of a fire ;-)

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Lol, just dump energy into resistors. Or desync two generators.

            • kaffiene@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Or convert excess to hydrogen and provide resilience, or have arrangements for industry to consume the excess. Or ramp down your generation at those times. Or shift excess to neighbouring grids.

        • fellowmortal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          This is wrong. Right now, europe is experiencing high pressure and doesn’t have any wind. Check this out its map that shows you how much wind is being produced right now! Can you provide a source that says " the wind is always blowing somewhere" or is it just a platitude?

      • oo1@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        it has got cheaper, but it has to get cheap enough that you can buy enough batteries with the difference. I’m not sure it has become that cheap. Maybe these sodium battery things will get developed.

    • partizan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      You probably also didnt heard about Thorium based molten salt reactors, they are much safer than conventional nuclear, also cheaper, and you can have a 50MW installation in space not much larger than a shipping container. A 50MW solar installation is close to 1km2 and thats without any storage included. It even can be modified to run on spent fuel of conventional nuclear power plants.