• auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Maximum wage only makes sense as a percentage of other people in the company. Ie. The maximum allowed is 10x more than the minimum wage paid in the company

    Anything else means the money would just go to shareholders

    And obviously, a minimum wage permitted too by amount

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      C-suite compensation is already largely handled by share offers - which get further pumped/paid for by share buyback schemes.

      This would just further exacerbate it, unless we first re-ban buybacks.

      Honestly, we should just ban them regardless.

      • BKXcY86CHs2k8Coz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think we can do better: nobody who doesn’t work X nunber of hours per week can own stock. That’s how law firms organized as S-Corps do it. Even if the decisionmakers hardly do real work, they have to be at work to gain on their investment. But also, no golden parachutes and executives should be legally responsible for suffering and death from their policies.