• gunnm@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The good thing about Lemmy you can move to another instance with free speech.

    • Imotali@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is free speech. They get to say what they please. They are not free from the consequences of those words however. I, as a private citizen and not a governmental actor, can censor them.

      • gunnm@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I disagree, free speech means the right to express any opinions and ideas without censorship or restraint even if you find them offensive.

        You said you will remove any comment that is transphobic and ban if “you make an egregiously off colour comment”.

        That is not free speech, and it’s ok. Your instance, your rules.

        • Imotali@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They can say what they want without restraint or restriction. They are not free from the consequences of their words.

          They can say what they like. We can ban them if we don’t like it. That’s how free speech works in a consequentialist society (modern Western society is a synthesis of consequentialism and contractualism).

          • gunnm@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Censor and banning opinions and ideas you don’t like is anti free speech.

            • Imotali@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You were allowed to say it. I’m allowed to remove it. Welcome to the world. Don’t like it? Leave.

              But also: nobody in the world actually likes the idea of absolutist free speech. The founding fathers certainly didn’t believe in such an idea.

          • Pokethat@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s literally not free speech. If I say I like to eat broccoli every day and that people should try it for health reasons and you’re some kind of carnivore mod and it tickles you the wrong way and you block me for it… That’s censorship and the opposite of free speech.

            You’re telling me that you control the narrative. Now there’s nuance to censorship for sure, but you’re telling me that if you don’t like what I say I’m out. I have to type within the confines of the bubble of what isn’t too uncomfortable for you.

            I say let the downvotes do the talking. If I go on the electric vehicles instance talking about how (non-ironocally) I love to roll coal and how that’s what’s keeping me from trying EVs, I expect to be downvoted into the shadow realm. And that’s ok. What I’m not ok with is a mod assuming that my voice sucks and that I don’t deserve to be heard. Maybe some smart lemmier(?) will point out some doodad that makes a brrr noise and shoots out some harmless mist or something.

            • david@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You have the right to be an asshole. Mods have the right to ban you for being an asshole.

              Making out that they’re nasty for having some standards of behaviour in their area is calling good bad and bad good.

              (Censorship is when local or national government put you in prison for protesting or ban your book or ban your ideas. That’s when your free speech rights are being infringed.)