Kid@sh.itjust.worksM to Cybersecurity@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agoFortiGate admins report active exploitation 0-day. Vendor isn’t talking.arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up156arrow-down10cross-posted to: arstechnica_index@rss.ponder.cat
arrow-up156arrow-down1external-linkFortiGate admins report active exploitation 0-day. Vendor isn’t talking.arstechnica.comKid@sh.itjust.worksM to Cybersecurity@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square4fedilinkcross-posted to: arstechnica_index@rss.ponder.cat
minus-squarenul9o9@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 months agoIf everything in the article is correct, then nobody should be using this vendor.
minus-squareKid@sh.itjust.worksOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoNevertheless: https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/blog/crowdstrike-fortinet-partnership-unifies-endpoint-firewall-protection/
minus-squarenul9o9@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoThat headline alone almost gave me an aneurism 😂
minus-squareNightwatch Admin@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoDan Goodin is a reliable journalist, but fwiw we’ve had several vulnerabilities from Fortinot that weren’t really well handled, so if you’re still on their crummy devices it’s your own fault.
If everything in the article is correct, then nobody should be using this vendor.
Nevertheless: https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/blog/crowdstrike-fortinet-partnership-unifies-endpoint-firewall-protection/
That headline alone almost gave me an aneurism 😂
Dan Goodin is a reliable journalist, but fwiw we’ve had several vulnerabilities from Fortinot that weren’t really well handled, so if you’re still on their crummy devices it’s your own fault.