• Clasm@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Art exists solely as it is interpreted by the observer.

    In this case, the observer interrupted the art as trash.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    To be fair, I feel like that’s kind of what the artist was hoping for. Would you be reading about his piece if some Philistine with no concept of what constitutes art hadn’t thrown it away?

  • Salvo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is terrible.

    Aluminium cans should have gone in the recycling! ♻️

  • wildcardology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    There was another story like this. The exhibit depicts an after party scene with champagne bottles and other party “trash” everywhere. It was placed in a room. The custodians thought there was a party earlier and promptly cleaned the room.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        i love museums and art centers.

        the great thing about art is everyone is free to define it how they want, and no one is wrong.

        “art” to you, “garbage” to me