• halvar@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I looked at this with suspicion, decided it wasn’t AI, then I went into the comments and got convinced otherwise. It’s scary.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    wtf is going on with his feet

    (he said, already knowing the answer)

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      it’s amazing how that isn’t even what tipped me off, it just vaguely looks like AI, which is a tad strange for such a simple style

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        AI seems to really love that extreme high contrast side-lighting on everything. Then the text itself is irregular in a very non-human kind of way, like there’s no natural processes that would result in an ‘E’ like the one in ‘BECAUSE’.

        Then you’ve got the person’s face, which if it were drawn by an artist of the skill level we’d expect from the rest of the piece, one would imagine they’d do a better job of conveying some sort of personality or emotion.

        AI Art is fundamentally antisocial because it’s the Art equivalent of the Bullshit Asymmetry Principle; it took less effort for OP to create that than it did to pick apart exactly why it feels so unsatisfying and unsettling in all the wrong ways. Always downvote AI Art.

  • archonet@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Ah, what a marvelous idea, we should look to the present!

    [reads the news]

    Hm. I think I may have noticed a problem with this theory.

  • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Honestly, if I wheren’t addicted to Lemmy or Reddit, I would have a pretty decent life.

  • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It is quite logical to search for something in the place where it might be (future) and not in the place where it obviously isn’t (present).

  • Deme@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The idea is good enough that it would’ve deserved at least some effort in the final execution.