• millie@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Oh no, not a better job market, more available housing, and less pollution! What a catastrophy!

    Flippancy aside, of course birth rates are declining. Of course constant expansion isn’t sustainable. The systemic gluttony of capitalism literally cannot go on forever, and the faster we slow it down the better. It’s a cancer on our species and our planet. If we want to continue to exist in any capacity we need to get it under control, and that’s going to require reconsidering things like constant market growth and never letting the population fall.

    • dumples@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They are two ways for species to reduce their population. They way it happens for everything that cannot control their own birth rates (i.e. everything except us) it a catastrophic death rate increases via disease, predication or hunger. We control our birth rate to have get to a sustainable levels. Seems cruel to go the other way

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    20 hours ago

    oligarchs are shitting their pants over it because fewer births means less money for every single industry that makes money

    fuck them

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Current “AI” is used as cover for huge out sourcing wave they been doing since COVID.

        Dont fall for the propaganda

    • dumples@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Maybe these productive gains we have been making for decades can be used to help with the small population

  • Zaleramancer@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This article fails to address one of the main causes I see people list for not having kids. It’s, “Is it okay for me to bring a kid into a world this fucked up?”

    A lot of young people are deeply certain that they’re going to have to live through an ecological collapse and climate disasters. Why would they want to have a child, and be constantly faced with the fact that their kid is going to have a worse life than them. That their grandkids may not know what seasons were like?

    It’s also so ridiculously expensive now. It’s not worth it.

    • hanrahan@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m 60, I asked myself this at 20 and answered no and had a vasectomy. Not just for any kids but for the biosphere itself, we in the developed world in particular, walk heavily upon this earth.

      The destruction is accelerating I guess and is more obvious now but it’s been like this my entire procreating life, yiu just had to actually observe.

    • dumples@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I thought they mentioned the expense and climate change. They obviously didn’t go into depth. I thought it was interesting that its important enough that NPR is bringing it up

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Good for them. Enjoy your life, save money without having to work more, and preserve your sanity.

    Kids are overrated.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Kids are great and natural thing that happens when people live on developed AND healthy societies… We got neither

      It makes sense that people are opting out or having 1

      • paperBark@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You can afford cat food? My cat’s high fiber food (needed for gut issues unfortunately) went from $55 CAD before COVID to $130 CAD per bag.