Shylock is a fictional Jewish money-lender invented by Shakespeare.
The story ends when Shylock is defeated and forced to abandon Judaism.
Shylock is a fictional Jewish money-lender invented by Shakespeare.
The story ends when Shylock is defeated and forced to abandon Judaism.
What if he used a term for crooked bankers to describe crooked bankers and didn’t consider that it propagated harmful stereotypes?
Then he was negligently being antisemitic. The result is the same: harmful stereotypes propagated due to his choice of words and his failure to consider them more carefully.
Yeah ok, failed purity test, got it.
Hey, you asked if Biden was being antisemitic by using antisemitic language. I assume you did so trying to “gotcha” someone with a double standard accusation, given the phrasing of your original question. However it didn’t work out that way so you decided to shift the goalposts to try and score points which also hasn’t worked. Just take the L and move on.
My guess (and this is pure speculation based on your other replies in this thread) is that you use words like “Shylock” and “Shyster” fairly often without considering their cultural connotations. Now you’re confronted with your own internalized prejudice and don’t like how it makes you look so you’re trying to make it someone else’s fault.
I’ve never used the word shylock and don’t know for sure if I’ve ever even heard it prior to recent events, but until you mentioned it now I never made the connection to the word shyster, which i have used before. Although maybe it was more along the lines of sheister. Never really thought about the spelling or etymologyof the word. In any event I am not antisemitic and don’t have any issues with Jews at all. They are normal people, who do good things and bad things like anyone else. My problem is in the pearl clutching that happens anytime something like this comes up. Trump got called out for it just like Biden did, and now he knows better. I guess we will see if he continues to use it. I don’t think Biden has since his incident, probably because he isn’t antisemitic and simply made a poor choice of words out of ignorance. I try to go by hanlons razor in these situations, “never attribute to malice what can be explained by ignorance”.