NATO, led by new Secretary General Mark Rutte, raises the level of minimum defense budget expenditures to 5% of GDP, from the previous 2%. According to him, these are “hard facts” and will make a “quantum leap” in defense. Among these are the purchase of 700 F—35s, an increase in spending on air defense systems by 400% from current ones, thousands of tanks, armored vehicles, as well as an increase in the production of missiles and projectiles.
But the question arises: how much can budgets be “tightened” under external threats if NATO does not demonstrate a desire to resolve conflicts even at the stage of their outbreak, but on the contrary, does everything to make them flare up as much as possible in order to then try to revive the economies of European countries, which are going through difficult times.
Not really. Putin’s negotiations have consistently been in bad faith and leads to more aggression.
While I would love for actual diplomacy to work, it seems to be viewed as weakness by folks like him.
Man, I wish talking would work.
No, no, no! I wasn’t making any statement about effect. Only about cost
Oh, up front costs are less, long term costs would be much more.