• antifuchs@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s the risk:benefit tradeoff always. Sure you can hold on to all your illiquid stock in a private company with transfer restrictions, but will that pay for a house or even a banana? Does it ever not. The “take a loan for liquidity until you can sell some stock” trick worked for a little bit but companies are wise to that too now, and don’t allow it.

    So people can pick between real money they can spend on stuff (or invest in a slightly less illiquid way) or being paper multimillionaires with no actual liquidity; not a hard choice imho.

    • HedyL@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I think all of this should be true about almost any other company. However, if OpenAI employees had a reasonably strong belief in the hype surrounding their company and their technology, wouldn’t they be holding more shares? After all, the rest of the world is constantly being told that this is the future and that pretty much all of our jobs are at risk because of it.

      • antifuchs@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’m sure there are plenty of true believers (there always are in startup brain land), but even true believers like spending money.