• balderdash@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Voting is necessary civil engagement: but it is insufficient. Both parties agree on the two-party system. Both parties agree on first past the post voting. Both parties agree on taking money from “good” billionaires (i.e., legal bribery). Both parties agree on insider trading. Both parties agree on government bailouts. Both parties agree on proxy wars. And so on. In a two-party system, who do we vote for to address these issues?

    Of course there are meaningful differences between the parties. But they use social issues (e.g., immigration) to divide the American people so they do not notice just how much both parties agree on. We need deeper systemic changes to this system that literally will never happen through voting.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Rather than complaining that both parties are the same, try voting in congressional primaries. They see less than 15% turnout. You know who always votes? Retirees, and they have very different needs than the working class.

      • balderdash@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        4 days ago

        Again, there is too much overlap on the Venn Diagram. The source of these problem is the two-party system itself, which means it will never change through voting. We effectively have a democratic voice for things that the parties disagree on, but do not have a voice for anything that both parties agree on.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          So if the two-party system is the problem, how do you think continuing to avoid participation will change something? Try something different and vote in primaries.

          • balderdash@lemmy.zipOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            I’ve endorsed voting five times already in this thread and yet I still get the same response. It’s like Americans think civil engagement begins and ends at voting. Ironically, the point of this post is to call that very line of thinking into question.

          • balderdash@lemmy.zipOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Let me guess: Democrats are completely innocent in our present state of this affairs, right? If we just get more Democrats in all three branches of government, they will fix all our problems. Is that it?

            I don’t blame you: I used to think the same. But what does it take to see this is a bipartisan problem? We have President Biden and Bernie Sanders both warning about the oligarchy, and you people think they’re just talking about Republicans. For fucks sake…

            • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              You want to point fingers but we all play a part. The electorate are complacent, lazy, moronic, consumers, who think civics is a car made in japan.

              • balderdash@lemmy.zipOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Agreed, but I can’t be too critical of the American people. Most of us are kept in a perpetual state of “getting by”.