Suspension is supposed to punish actual actions, that are breeches e.g. fistfights, criticising the speaker, stepping to someone and telling them to “stand up” for a fight, etc.
The physical actions currently being punished are not 7x worse than anything else on record (e.g. all the above).
As for disdain, it’s also arguably disdainful to our democratic system to completely abandon the scale/tradition of punishments that have been handed out during the entire history of our Parliament.
They deliberately and intentionally disrupted the process of Parliament, by actions that were planned ahead of time. Even Chris Hipkins hasn’t defended their actions, only saying he feels the punishment was overly harsh.
Disrupted the process by a couple of minutes. Big whoop. The process didn’t end, nothing was cancelled and you shouldn’t believe the lie that the TMP prevented ACT from voting. That was a libel told by the National party which should be punishable by a much higher level.
The punishment was purely based on racism. If any other party had done this they wouldn’t be punished this bad.
I don’t think anyone disputes that they intentionally disrupted the process of Paliament.
I too am pointing out that the punishment is overly disproportionate.
I also think if you want a harsher penalty than a few days’ suspension, it should not be one that comes at the expense of the constituency, as this one does.
That’s a thought crime.
Suspension is supposed to punish actual actions, that are breeches e.g. fistfights, criticising the speaker, stepping to someone and telling them to “stand up” for a fight, etc.
The physical actions currently being punished are not 7x worse than anything else on record (e.g. all the above).
As for disdain, it’s also arguably disdainful to our democratic system to completely abandon the scale/tradition of punishments that have been handed out during the entire history of our Parliament.
They deliberately and intentionally disrupted the process of Parliament, by actions that were planned ahead of time. Even Chris Hipkins hasn’t defended their actions, only saying he feels the punishment was overly harsh.
Disrupted the process by a couple of minutes. Big whoop. The process didn’t end, nothing was cancelled and you shouldn’t believe the lie that the TMP prevented ACT from voting. That was a libel told by the National party which should be punishable by a much higher level.
The punishment was purely based on racism. If any other party had done this they wouldn’t be punished this bad.
I don’t think anyone disputes that they intentionally disrupted the process of Paliament.
I too am pointing out that the punishment is overly disproportionate.
I also think if you want a harsher penalty than a few days’ suspension, it should not be one that comes at the expense of the constituency, as this one does.