grrgyle@slrpnk.netM to ✍️ Writing@slrpnk.netEnglish · 20 days ago

ATTN: The "* * *" used to separate sections of writing is called a "Dinkus"

1

22

ATTN: The "* * *" used to separate sections of writing is called a "Dinkus"

grrgyle@slrpnk.netM to ✍️ Writing@slrpnk.netEnglish · 20 days ago

1

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinkus

May this news brighten your day.

Found while reading up on asterism (⁂) as an alternate symbol to describe the fediverse. Anyway, this sounds especially funny in English, because “Dingus” can mean a foolish person.

You must log in or register to comment.

Chat

wether@slrpnk.net
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
3·
20 days ago
The asterism is such a great idea for the Fediverse logo imo. Just on the grounds that it’s actually typeable compared to the hexagram thing that I also see around.
neidu3@sh.itjust.works
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
1·
edit-2
20 days ago
deleted by creator

✍️ Writing@slrpnk.net

writing@slrpnk.net

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !writing@slrpnk.net

A community for writers, like poems, fiction, non-fiction, short stories, long books, all those sorts of things, to discuss writing approaches and what’s new in the writing world, and to help each other with writing.

Rules for now:

1. Try to be constructive and nice. When discussing approaches or giving feedback to excerpts, please try to be constructive and to maintain a positive vibe. For example, don’t just vaguely say something is bad but try to list and explain downsides, and if you can, also find some upsides. However, this is not to say that you need to pretend you liked something or that you need to hide or embellish what you disliked.

2. Mention own work for purpose and not mainly for promo: Feel free to post asking for feedback on excerpts or worldbuilding advice, but please don’t make posts purely for self promo like a released book. If you offer professional services like editing, this is not the community to openly advertise them either. (Mentioning your occupation on the side is okay.) Don’t link your excerpts via your website when asking for advice, but e.g. Google Docs or similar is okay. Don’t post entire manuscripts, focus on more manageable excerpts for people to give feedback on.

3. What happens in feedback or critique requests posts stays in these posts: Basically, if you encounter someone you gave feedback to on their work in their post, try not to quote and argue against them based on their concrete writing elsewhere in other discussions unless invited. (As an example, if they discuss why they generally enjoy outlining novels, don’t quote their excerpts to them to try to prove why their outlining is bad for them as a singled out person.) This is so that people aren’t afraid to post things for critique.

4. All writing approaches are valid. If someone prefers outlining over pantsing for example, it’s okay to discuss up- and downsides but don’t tell someone that their approach is somehow objectively worse. All approaches are on some level subjective anyway.

5. Solarpunk rules still apply. The general rules of solarpunk of course still apply.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

6 users / day
7 users / week
42 users / month
161 users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
187 subscribers
49 Posts
222 Comments
Modlog