President Biden is finalizing plans to endorse major changes to the Supreme Court in the coming weeks, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code, according to two people briefed on the plans.

He is also weighing whether to call for a constitutional amendment to eliminate broad immunity for presidents and other constitutional officeholders, the people said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations.

The announcement would mark a major shift for Biden, a former chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who has long resisted calls to reform the high court. The potential changes come in response to growing outrage among his supporters about recent ethics scandals surrounding Justice Clarence Thomas and decisions by the new court majority that have changed legal precedent on issues including abortion and federal regulatory powers.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It would involve winning the Presidency and both houses of Congress in the next election, and then nuking the Filibuster.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 month ago

      keeping republicans from retaining the house and taking the senate and white house is pretty much mandatory at this point.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      So it’s a completely empty promise.

      Democrats will never nuke the filibuster. Ever. It’s what lets them pretend their hands are tied when they kill progressive legislation they ran on but never had any intention of ever implementing.

      They would rather lose Democracy forever than abandon the relic of Jim Crow they use for its intended purpose.

    • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      Theyve had a shit ton of opportunities to kill the filibuster, but dont want to lose that rotating villain.

    • Crow_Thief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      1 month ago

      The thing he already chose not to do. If it cant be done by Biden unilaterally at this point, it cant be done by him at all.

      • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Manchin and Sinema voted against abolishing the filibuster; Biden was in favor of removing he, he just didn’t have the votes.

        • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          And what were the calls to primary the people that would not vote in favor of it in the midterms? That’s how people hold their politicians accountable. But VBNMW people never hold their politicians accountable that’s why the politicians keep getting worse because they don’t have to work in favor of their votes, because they’re going to get them regardless of what they do, no matter how shitty the policy no matter how shitty the rhetoric, the loyalists will stay in line.