Bids opened Monday for a contract to supply the state Department of Education with 55,000 Bibles. According to the bid documents, vendors must meet certain specifications: Bibles must be the King James Version; must contain the Old and New Testaments; must include copies of the Pledge of Allegiance, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights; and must be bound in leather or leather-like material.

A salesperson at Mardel Christian & Education searched, and though they carry 2,900 Bibles, none fit the parameters.

But one Bible fits perfectly: Lee Greenwood’s God Bless the U.S.A. Bible, endorsed by former President Donald Trump and commonly referred to as the Trump Bible. They cost $60 each online, with Trump receiving fees for his endorsement.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Forcing your State to buy 55000 Bibles from ONLY Trump is PROOF that DEMOCRATS are the Swamp!

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is the perfect job for the satanic temple.

    The bible, complete with all American founders documents : brought to you by satan.

    • eodur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 month ago

      I so want them to do this. Big ol baphomet right on the cover, and put the TST tenets on the first page. If they undercut the Trump bible aren’t they kind of obligated to go with the cheaper option?

    • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yep! That’s why they’re counting on, throwing enough dollars at the conservative judges that they will let this theocratic bullshit stand.

      Fuck them and anyone who supports their religion

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s probably purposely designed to create a court case so the Supreme Court can hollow out that principle.

    • 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 month ago

      Some denominations do believe that only the KJV is the correct English translation. Many of those people do not understand what the words actually mean. They interpret the text very narrowly and frequently are told by others what interpretation is correct.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        Which the whole symbolism of the temple veil being torn when Jesus carked on the cross was meant to mean there was no need for anyone (the clergy) to do that or to intercede.

      • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        “If the King James version was good enough for Jesus, it’s good enough for me”.

        I live in the shithole south, and I have heard this unironically on multiple occasions. Please send help. And education.

    • milkisklim@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s public domain so they don’t have to pay for the copyright of a modern translation.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sure along with ever other translation I can find. I prefer the geneva translation but that is hard to find so I often end up with the king james when I need a printed copy. for those not familar, the good parts of king james is where they took the geneva and updated to modern english - this should tell you something about my tastes.

  • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    With the 3 million they would save buying the cheaper bibles(something they shouldn’t be doing either) they could wash a lot of men’s feet. They could be teaching all these students how to fish. That is their job after all.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    if that doesnt convince you that religion is made up on the spot for conniving convenience, nothing will

  • bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Rev 22:18 NET testify to the one who hears the words of the prophecy contained in this book: If anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book

    I always object to adding anything to the bible. It is fine to want a printed constitution but it should be a separate book.

    • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Look, I hate this too, but that’s not what that passage means, clearly. Addendums aren’t the same as adding new fake scripture (although since there are multiple ideologies on what books of the Bible should be cannon, who’s to say). Put your pitchfork down.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bible […] must include copies of the Pledge of Allegiance, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights

    I’m sorry? Why would people mixed (modern) political text to their religious ones? Aren’t people buying bibles suppose to care about their religion?