• silverlose@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Here’s a list for you to read

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_crimes

    Using a definition is not an appeal to authority because definitions are conventions of language, not subjective claims requiring expert validation. An appeal to authority relies on credibility rather than reasoning, while a definition clarifies meaning for effective communication.

    • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      The appeal to authority is the presumption that your dictionary is a valid source for that info. Im sorry if that wasn’t clear in my last post but wikipedia is no different in this regard.

      Nation states do acts of war or causes of war.

      • silverlose@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        What does that even mean? You don’t like the dictionaries or Wikipedia and won’t say why. How are we supposed to talk about anything?

        Yeah if you want to change the definitions of all of the words to fit your narrative, then sure… whatever you say buddy

          • silverlose@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            You’re conflating research with conventions.

            A dictionary is generally considered a reference source rather than an academic source. While it provides standardized definitions, it does not offer original research, analysis, or scholarly discussion. However, specialized dictionaries (e.g., the Oxford English Dictionary or medical/legal dictionaries) can be cited in academic work when defining key terms.

            Do you expect to find a research paper on the definition of terrorism?