mesamune@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoLet Readers Read | Internet Archiveblog.archive.orgexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkLet Readers Read | Internet Archiveblog.archive.orgmesamune@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareImgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoIn the article it said they were lending to one user at a time though which seems reasonable. You are saying they didn’t actually do this and that is the reason they are in hot water? So they are basically just denying that they did this?
minus-squarewagoner@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-22 months agoI’d like to see evidence of what the original poster on this thread says before trusting what they are saying. I haven’t seen this be the case at all. “We purchase and acquire books—yes, physical, paper books—and make them available for one person at a time to check out and read online”
minus-squareOdo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThe term you’re looking for is National Emergency Library.
In the article it said they were lending to one user at a time though which seems reasonable. You are saying they didn’t actually do this and that is the reason they are in hot water? So they are basically just denying that they did this?
I’d like to see evidence of what the original poster on this thread says before trusting what they are saying. I haven’t seen this be the case at all.
“We purchase and acquire books—yes, physical, paper books—and make them available for one person at a time to check out and read online”
The term you’re looking for is National Emergency Library.