What was your last RTFM adventure? Tinker this, read that, make something smoother! Or explodier.

As for me, I wanted to see how many videos I could run at once. (Answer: 60 frames per second or 60 frames per second?)

With my sights on GPUizing some ethically sourced motion pictures, I RTFW, graphed, and slapped on environment variables and flags like Lego bricks. I got the Intel VAAPI thingamabob to jaunt by (and found that it butterized my mpv videos)

$ pacman -S blahblahblahblahblahtfm
$ mpv --show-profile=fast
Profile fast: 
 scale=bilinear
 dscale=bilinear
 dither=no
 correct-downscaling=no
 linear-downscaling=no
 sigmoid-upscaling=no
 hdr-compute-peak=no
 allow-delayed-peak-detect=yes
$ mpv --hwdec=auto --profile=fast graphwar-god-4KEDIT.mp4
# fucking silk

But there was no pleasure without pain: Mr. Maxwell F. N. 940MX (the N stands for Nvidia) played hooky. So I employed the longest envvars ever

$ NVD_LOG=1 VDPAU_TRACE=2 VDPAU_NVIDIA_DEBUG=3 NVD_BACKEND=direct NVD_GPU=nvidia LIBVA_DRIVER_NAME=nvidia VDPAU_DRIVER=nvidia prime-run vdpauinfo
GPU at BusId 0x1 doesn't have a supported video decoder
Error creating VDPAU device: 1
# stfu

to try translating Nvidia VDPAU to VAAPI – of course, here I realized I rtfmed backwards and should’ve tried to use just VDPAU instead. So I did.

Juice was still not acquired.

Finally, after a voracious DuckDuckGoing (quacking?), I was then blessed with the freeing knowledge that even though post-Kepler is supposed to support H264, Nvidia is full of lies

 ______
< fudj >
 ------
          \   ‘^----^‘
           \ (◕(‘人‘)◕)
              (  8    )        ô
              (    8  )_______( )
              ( 8      8        )
              (_________________)
                ||          ||
               (||         (||

and then right before posting this, gut feeling: I can’t read.

$ lspci | grep -i nvidia
... NVIDIA Corporation GM108M [GeForce 940MX] (rev a2)
# ArchWiki says that GM108 isn't supported.
# Facepalm

SO. What was your last RTFM adventure?

  • not_amm@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Couldn’t get the geolocation work for weeks in openSUSE. I, supposedly, read the manual and checked everywhere and even asked in the opensuse forum, since the timing was perfect with Mozilla shutting down MLS, and it probably was a reason, but also any other alternative didn’t work. Some days ago I decided to RTFM of geoclue again, only to find out that I could just “hardcode” my location in an /etc/geolocation file >:(

  • confuser@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    for me it usually goes

    me: reads the manual, fails, then asks for help

    person helping: heres a canned tip

    me: didnt help

    person helping: you should read the manual

    me: no i am beyond that, i need help with my problem

    person helping: oh turns out i couldnt actually help you, anyways go try somewhere else

  • Bob Smith@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    For me, it was getting a handle on rsync for a better method of updating backup drives. I was tired of pushing incremental changes manually, but I decided to do a bit of extra reading before making the leap. Learning about the -n option for testing prior to a sync has saved me more headaches than I’d care to enumerate. There’s a big difference between changing a handful of files and copying several TB of files into the wrong subfolder!

    • fool@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh I love the “walk me through what I’m about to do” concept. Dry runs should be more common – especially in shell scripts…

      The world would be a better place if every install.sh had a --help, some nice printf’s saying “Moving this here” / “Overwrite? [Y/N]”, and perhaps even a shoehorned-in set -x.

      Hope your r/w wasn’t eaten up by the subfolder incident (that I presume happened) :P

      • Bob Smith@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m lucky I manually ran a few jobs before I started using rsync in scripts. When I didn’t think things through, I saw the output in real-time. After that, I got very careful about testing any scripts and accounting for minor changes in setup.

  • Skunk@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hardware related on a Linux home built NAS.

    My mobo has 2 nvme ports and supports 10th and 11th gen intel cpu. I have a 10th gen i5 and 2 nvme ssd for cache.

    The biggest 512Gb ssd is on the front (normal) side of the mobo, under a heatsink. The smaller 128Gb is under the mobo, inaccessible once fixed onto the case.

    In bios and in OS I can’t see the 512 cache drive, only the 128. Quick RTFM on the motherboard manual states: “Front nvme slot only works with 11th gen cpu”.

    FFS 🤦‍♂️

    The server is fully built in a hard to fit everything ITX case.

    Guess who is having only 128Gb cache instead of disassembling everything ?

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have been burnt too many times by vendor incompatibility at work to not read the manuals before deploying something.

  • pancake@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    One of the largest projects under my GitHub account is an attempt at a proof-based programming language that I had to abandon because I underestimated the theoretical work involved, did not RTFM enough and months into it realized the entire thing was unsound af.

    • RobotZap10000@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m very intrigued. Could you please explain it? Even if you abandoned it, you still learned valuable knowledge.

      • pancake@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, that’s true and a better way to look at it, thanks!

        Well, I was amazed by proof systems like Coq or Isabelle, that let one formally verify the correctness of their code. I learnt Coq and coded a few toy projects with it, but doing so felt pretty cumbersome. I looked at other options but none of them had a really good workflow.

        So, I attempted to design one from scratch. I tried to understand Coq’s mathematical foundation and reimplement it into a simpler language with more familiar syntax and a native compiler frontend. But I rushed through it and turns out I had barely scratched the surface of the theory. Not just regarding the proof system, but also with language design in general.

        I did learn a lot though. Since then I’ve been reading more about proof systems and language design in my spare time, and I’ve collected quite the stack of notes and drafts. Recently I’ve begun coding a way more polished version of that project, so on to round two I guess!

        • fool@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Round two, hell yeah.

          The aesthetica of a stack of notes, born from a “dead end”, is secretly an odd motivator. You look back and see

          Here is the breadth of what we did wrong.

          and then beyond you, the effort lays itself out in a pretty trusswork.

          _or_maybe_i_just_think_well-used_notebooks_are_pretty