Great! This isn’t really about ai, but police misrepresenting evidence to obtain a search warrant. If the warrant is invalid, you can’t count evidence obtained with it.
Ideally any officer intentionally misrepresenting the facts faces professional repercussions, but that’s another issue
Didn’t they use AI Facial Recognition to get that Linguini guy?
God damn. I’m a mod here. A subscriber to !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world and a resident of Cleveland.
Pretty sure I’m in the Matrix right now. You ever see those tv shows where the main characters are watching people they know on tv or mentioned on the news, within the tv show, and you think “Yeah, that’s all too main character syndrome to be realistic.”
That’s how I feel right now. Like somehow the universe posted this specific story here just for me.
Brownshirts say: name checks out
I was going to post in “No Stupid Questions” “Are the Cleveland Browns in the superbowl this year?” And then in the body I’d put “Cleveland resident here. Wrong answers only.”
But I don’t think people would find it as funny as I do. Same reason I don’t make the post I thought up last night about replacing everyones gender, and genitals with Samuel L Jackson. I find it funny, but other people might think I’m actually attacking their gender identity.
Mmmm mm, that is one tasty gender identity.
Say cishet one more time motherfucker
I felt the confirmation bias extremely when I read “Ultraprocessed people: the science of food that isn’t food”
I had been calling if a “food like product” for decades before reading the book. As in “that’s not food, it is a food like product”.
Or product derived from food
Police don’t care to solve the crime, they only care to pin that shit on somebody. This is inherently built into the system, and yet people still think pigs are here to do anything beyond being the boot on your neck and an occupation force of the elites.