• mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sad, from a nostalgia point of view, but probably a win, environmentally. We have a pipeline to recycle plastic bottles, the mylar pouches are pretty much all single use.

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Bottle deposit systems are generally effective. In Sweden, 90-95% of the pet plastic in drink bottles makes it back to a factory to be used as raw material for new bottles. We don’t really recycle the hdpe lids or polyester labels, though.

        • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s not actually a solution when talking single-use either. Remaking the bottles from recycled glass is incredibly energy intensive and not an environmentally friendly process either. Multi-use bottles are much better, but the cleaning required also isn’t that simple and also relatively energy intensive (far from remaking the bottles of course).

          There’s also practical downsides to glass (heavy, breakable), but those are subjective and their relevance highly depends on the use case.

          Ideally, we wouldn’t buy stuff to drink in any kind of bottle, but just use tap water. possibly just buy some concentrated stuff to then make your actual drink at home. Nothing beats the effectiveness of transporting water through a simple pipe, but that isn’t even possible everywhere in the world due to drinking water quality issues…

            • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Good job with reading you did there. Your didn’t even make it 8 words in and already decided to comment. Maybe give it another go, if you dare, and try getting a little further this time.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I see a ton of comments here hating on nostalgic people, with no actual nostalgic people in sight yet.

    Personally I don’t care if a pouched drink exists or not, but if they are no longer producing pouched drinks they should probably retire the brand.

    Do you remember what a CapriSun tastes like? It’s somewhere between an extremely-artificially flavored “juice” concentrate and a “fruit flavored” drink like Kool-Aid. The whole appeal was the packaging.

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh no. I can’t relive the childhood frustration of being unable to access that sweet nectar shielded behind an impenetrable puncture-proof material with no tools to work with but the flimsiest of mini plastic straws.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Plastic bottles in general should be illegal. It’s cans, glass bottles, or GTFO when it comes to beverages for me.

    • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      FYI cans have a plastic liner to prevent acidic foods from dissolving the aluminium, so there’s still some plastic in it (much less then fully plastic bottles tho)

      • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        We should really advance to “glass only” for single use containers (unless you have a really good reason to prefer plastic, like if it’s a medical product) and invest in the infrastructure to recycle them - a country can get up to a 99% recycle rate for glass if it puts the work in.

        Yes glass is potentially less safe but my gut tells me that the risk of more broken glass is offset by the reduced air pollution and associated health risks.

        • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s more that it’s heavier, so you have to transport a lot more weight for the same amount of product.

          Secondary to that, glass can’t be shaped as compactly as an aluminum can or plastic bottle, so it takes up more room for the same amount of product.

          There’s no perfect solution, which is why we have a lot of options.

          • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            There’s no perfect solution, which is why we have a lot of options.

            But in the category of “single use drinking containers”, all of the options besides glass carry with them more and worse externalities than what glass production and recycling carries. Which is why “having a lot of options” isn’t a positive in this case, it just means that a large part of the market is operating in a way that is more destructive to society than it needs to be.

            • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I dunno. it takes a lot more heat to melt and recycle some glass that plastic. that and the transport weight is a whole lot of extra environmental cost.
              and the whole separating by color thing in the recycling bins. best bet is to reuse the bottles for the same beverage by rinsing them back at the original bottling plant but that is a logistics nightmare

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have always, for the entirety of their existence, hated those dumb pouches. Good riddance as far as I’m concerned.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        They have these revolutionary containers made from paper that is layered in order to make it hard and card like. Almost stiff as a board. And is capable of holding liquids and also breaks down very easily. 😒

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          What are they lined with to prevent them from getting soggy from contact with the liquid?

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They made a really loud noise in the lunchroom if you inflated the pouch all the way, folded over the straw to seal it, then stomped on it really hard with your shoe. This was before mentally deranged people started shooting up schools though, so maybe don’t try it.

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mentally deranged people have been shooting up schools since before Capri Sun was even invented…

        How old are you?

          • Mjpasta710@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Columbine was far from the first school shooting. According to the Washington Post:

            “The first recorded school shooting in the United States was in 1853 at a schoolhouse in Louisville, Kentucky. On November 2, 1853, Matt Ward shot and killed teacher William H.G. Butler with a pistol hidden in his coat pocket.”

            • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I think the very important point you’re missing is that schools did not exist in fear of school shootings before Columbine. There were no lockdown drills and crazy security measures for entering and leaving the building. So making a big loud noise would not make people instantly think someone was shooting up the school like it very well might today.

              • Mjpasta710@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I’m not sure how I missed that from their first post. /s

                I get it, you’re scared. Noone was ever scared like that before.

                Edit: I looked it up, mocked a false statement and declaration of ignorance.

                Got downvoted. I’m not promoting violence, I’m mocking ignorance.