EU absolutely is a country.

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    For-profit social media, certainly. I don’t trust it anymore. Astroturfing, data-harvesting, I feel like they’re all made to fuck us over in some way.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube have fucked up public discourse. They reward rage-bait content, they’re addictive by design, encourage tribalism, and they use an opaque algorithm to promote/demote posts. They silently censor ideas and content. Meta censors news in Canada.

    Zuckerberg and Musk appear to have political aims they are using their platforms to promote.

    Why would I want that? I get the slippery slope argument, but they are a slippery slope already.

    • CybranM@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I wouldn’t lump in YT with those other two. YT definitely had problems but it has a lot of great content found no-where else

        • CybranM@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Perhaps, but you could remove Twitter today and not lose anything of value. There are alternatives for the first two but not for YT

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Yeah. We hate our social media, and don’t trust our government. Everyone else should absolutely ban our social media, yesterday, if not sooner.

      Edit: And in response to lots of much more reasonable responses here, than mine: spot on!

      The real wisdom is to ban our (United States) shitty social media’s shitty behaviors, rather than playing platform bop-a-mole.

  • bouh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Twitter is not a social media anymore, it is a propaganda platform. There are regulations for media in civilized places. Twitter does not respect the law, thus it shall be banned.

    If it were up to me it would be seized, because there is a public interest to this platform. Seizing it to make the algorithm transparent, fair and legal.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I really hope the EU will ban it, but I’m afraid they will ask firmly for “some changes”, and claim victory over whatever “small change” is in reality. Their investigation took too long and the lead was replaced already. Then they will declare that “recent events and information were not taken in account” and go on for another N years of investigations.

      • biofaust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Sadly, the EU recently did exactly the opposite, by taking Twitter off the DMA VLOPs list for lack of a large business user base dependent on its services.

        Practically Musk cratered it in order to snap off of what he sees as shackles.

  • richardisaguy@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    i live in Brazil, and would be 100% down with X being banned, even Instagram or Facebook if necessary.

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    I am actively avoiding US social media accounts, blocking US politics channels and stepping away from a number of US-based services altogether.

    If the government doesn’t do it, I’ll do as much of it as I can. Voting with your wallet is some US anarchocapitalist nonsense, but if my disgust removes incentives I’ll take it as a side benefit.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Voting with your wallet is some US anarchocapitalist nonsense

      I don’t understand what you mean.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Man, such an exhausting tangent to go on.

        Oversimplifying, “vote with your wallet” is a dereliction of duty of regulation, assuming that magical market forces will impose positive outcomes if we all just chip in on some sort of soft boycott.

        In practice, at scale, people can’t be expected to run a personal audit of all the money they spend or all the things they need. Money isn’t support. Support is support. Preventing market forces from doing garbage stuff is what regulations are for, not consumer spending choices.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        They mean it doesn’t work. “Vote with your wallet” is pushed heavily by billionaires. Almost like they have the biggest wallets…

  • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m an American and I think America social media should be banned.

    That is, closed-source, centralized for-profit social media platforms that will inevitably devolve into ads and data collection machines should be banned.

    The problem isn’t the country that hosts the platform. The problem is the incentive structure for social media to profit off its users.

    Platforms that are either FOSS, run by non-profits, or pay-to-use don’t have an intrinsic incentive to exploit its users and can, in theory, be run ethically and sustainably.

  • Nicht BurningTurtle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    No. That wouldn’t solve anything. What is needed are very harsh punishments for companies abusing their power / position, instead of the slap on the wrist they currently are.

    • Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      It would remove the possibility of feed shaping algorithm bias for mass manipulation, and back doors for spying and sabotage.

  • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 days ago

    Well, EU is not a country, but yeah, they should either comply with our rules (which currently neither one of them does), or get fucked out of here.

    I hope some local, ActivityPub based service would appear in the vacuum.

  • python@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    9 days ago

    naah fuck that, I think the internet should go back to being as unregulated and wild as possible

    • Glasgow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      People have lost their minds because of a recommender algorithm and echo chambers. Ai agents are going to tear us to shreds.

    • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      That means no big platforms, but instead smaller niche sites.

      If big US tech companies exist, we can’t have a wild and free web.