• candyman337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I understand cheating is shitty but it would make a lot more sense for the teacher to make this a teachable moment about cheating, and to promote collaborative solutions, but also checking work you get from others.

    A huge part of development is copying code and reusing code from libraries. The important part is that you know how the code you copy works.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Teachable moments” are for freshmen. Cheating seniors can get fucked.

      On a very related note, I actually earned my CS degree.

      • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        As someone who only cheated in one class because the professor was a lazy fuck and assigned 5 hours worth of problems for a 1 hour exam with no regard to whether it was completable, I agree. The whole class cheated, because they had to. We actually all knew the material really well because distributing that material across 20 students was still iffy on time.

        He’s dead now, the lazy fuck. Fuck you Dr. Aung.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    You are the Devil.

    I mean you really are, you tempted people into sin and then laughed as they were damned for it.

  • zazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    when a professor does this they’re “based” and “brainpilled” but when I pretend to sell crack on the benches outside, all of a sudden the judge claims it’s “entrapment” and “illegal” smh…

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      At this point I’m only hoping to emerge from the other side of the “based” fad although I’ve never understood what it meant. WTaF is “brain pilled”?

      Groovy. Tubular. Fetch.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Here’s the real answer for based:

        “Based” (corruption of base head - from someone who smokes base - street name for crack cocaine) was popular as an insult in rap / African American circles in the early 00s

        Rapper Lil B got called it and decided on a whim to pretend the meaning was changed to mean something positive, started using it in this way, it caught on - mostly through the new York scene and its attendant twitter following

        As all slang does in the last ~100-150 years, passed from black people to everyone.

        
        Brain pilled is a reference to The Matrix f/t Keanu Reeves in which Morpheus - whose namesake is the God of dreams - offers to wake up Neo from his fake reality by taking the red pill - leading to the phrase "red pilled" meaning (a right wing variant of) "woke." 
        
        Over time [x]-pilled became slang like how Watergate/ [x]-gate became a suffix to imply an imbrolglio.
    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Entrapment is coercing someone into committing a crime they wouldn’t have otherwise.

      This was a honeypot. A bait for those who were already looking to cheat.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        There’s no evidence that those who cheated were already going to.

        The prof said it was only suspected that students were cheating, and instead of investigating and collecting evidence, he fabricated evidence through his own encouragement of the same crime he seeks to denounce.

        • Strykker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Entrapment is basically associated with an implied threat, with that threat people do things they normally wouldn’t, if there was no threat then it’s less likely to be considered entrapment.

          Also entrapment only matters for criminal justice, you getting fucked at university for cheating isn’t going to care about how entrapment works.

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I didn’t mean to argue that it’s entrapment specifically. I do think that the prof was in wrong, though.

  • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Cheating in academia is the name of the game. There is a survivor bias here assuming the other 78 students didn’t cheat. They’re Learning how to not get caught. Building a better trap may simply yield a better better cheater. The proof ends up being in the work.

    I still think honeypots are amusing AF.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      At a certain point though, you’ve just plain done the work. If you jump through enough hoops to cheat then you have to know the material well enough. Like doing a bunch of editing passes on downloaded papers.

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    That’s entrapment. If it’s illegal for a cop to make an arrest like that, the professor shouldn’t be able to get people expelled like that.