- cross-posted to:
- unions@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- unions@lemmy.ml
Starbucks Workers United accused the company of “backtracking on our promised path forward” and failing to present a “serious economic proposal” to unionized baristas.
Starbucks Workers United accused the company of “backtracking on our promised path forward” and failing to present a “serious economic proposal” to unionized baristas.
Strikes don’t work in that case. Strikes only make sense in times where there’s a shortage of labor force. But in this case, the opposite is the case: there’s more than enough potential workers, and that’s why wages are low.
The labor market is a market. It has supply (workers) and demand (jobs). High supply --> lower prices (wages). Higher demand --> higher prices (wages). It’s that simple.
Fundamentally, workers in the US, no - wait, actually, worldwide, are fucked. There’s a declining number of well-paying jobs, and the supply of workers has stayed constant or even increased over the last 60 years. Of course, that leads to lower wages. I don’t think we can “innovate” our way out of this one. The only true solution that can pacify the people and avert a civil war is the Universal Basic Income - it guarantees that people can have viable lifes and have “too much to lose”. There’s no alternative - demand it from your politicians!
Ah, the slightly-to-the-left viewpoint. Always so longing for peace thats focused on a future global system ofvalue attribution that isn’t separated from capitalism entirely.
Wait a second, this would imply…do you have a politician!!!
ya, they area’t yours, mine, or even to themselves.