Just changed it to hunter3, thought it was time I should upgrade security

Moscow

Far left

Well light is also a wave and radio is also photons, and I’m sure that’s not taught in high school

If you’d like a real answer, because of particle-wave duality, all electro magnetic emmission can be quantized as photons, including radio waves. Now is it redunant to say photons of light instead of just light? Yes

Mmmm AI art in research journals, thanks physorg

The best code its given me I’d been able to search for and find where it was taken. Hey it helped me discover some real human blogs with vastly more helpful information.

(If you’re curious, it was circa when there was that weird infight at openclosedAI with altman, I prompted to give code to find the rotational inertia per axis and to my surprise and suspicion the answer made too much sense. Backsearching I found where I believe it got this answer from)

Okay

Last I checked, brandishing a weapon is not any more legal, nor is negligent discharge of a weapon.

Whatever you do, don’t install clockwork and valkerien skies. You maybe become but a memory to your wife

So don’t vote? Guess we’ll call it 98% for our glorious leader

Hey if your actual job is process optimization, you get to enjoy it twice as much 🥲

Fucking magnets, how do they work?

Sorry! I don’t mean to appropriate the article, I did read and agree with what it has to say.

But at the risk of sounding reductionary, the people who care and have influence over climatological matters don’t give a shit about what Trump has to spout on the matter, and the people listening to him will not have their minds changed.

And again to be reductionary, we know our effect on the climate, nuance only blurs picture for average people. This is partially talked about in the article as for the planetary/regional temperature difference, but personally I think this is something general science communication could work on, which we’ve seen as climate change vs global warming, though both describe the same thing.

Models blur the laymans picture and feeds into denial when predictions aren’t correct, and as their value lies in future predictions that past trends also corroborate, more emphasis should be put on said measureable effects.

Just my 2¢, no disagreement with the article intended

We’ll call these hot models, since they obviously are too pessimistic, so we’ll make some biased models

1 decade later, “hot models” more accurately predicted our current state

Huh maybe these new models are too pessimistic

It’s the left who is dividing us by having the R’s run a convicted felon! I don’t understand how anybody doesn’t understand this !!

Saw crazy YouTube recommendations:

Second law of thermodynamics would like to chime in, even with such a perfect nonexistent power source, waste heat is still an issue… which you can radiate to space, which would take tremendous land use to facilitate…

Or we use that land and capital and effort for solar power, which exists and could power practically everything in our lives, minus AI. Sounds like a win to me.

(Also not to mention the necessity to fire up more fossils for this shit to compensate for the current lack of miracle power for their pipe dreams)