That’s not at all what this is doing. It’s a call to make sure businesses out a priority on making these machine learning models less opaque, so you can see the inputs it used, the connections it found at each step to be able to see why a result was given.

You can’t debug a black box (you put in into and get an unexplained output) remotely as easily, if at all

This sounds like they’re talking about machine learning models, not the glorified autocorrect LLMs. So the actually useful AI stuff that can be leveraged to do real, important things with large sets of data that would be much more difficult for humans to spot.

I doubt they’re impressed, just disdainful if you don’t have one.

Yeah we’re clearly talking about different things here. This dataset does not seem to differentiate between shootings that occurred between specific individuals with a grievance, while technically on school grounds, but likely both outside, and outside of normal school hours, likely gang and drug related, and individuals who choose to go Rambo on nonspecific or at least a large group of people within the school, during normal hours. Which are very different scenarios with very different motivations and potential remedies.

The problem is that’s not a sustainable withdrawal rate. Also it’s 10% average before factoring in inflation, so I’m real dollars it’s close to 7% on average, but some years are a negative return, where you’re eating into the principle, and require a portion of the up years to make up for those.

An indefinitely sustainable withdrawal rate is closer to 3.5%.

Also the federal poverty line is horrendously out of touch.

And that’s literally how retirement accounts work, so it’s not really that fucked up a concept

How will you address the hit to morale?

“By making it worse!”

Bullshit right wing propaganda lies

About 4 months before I have to sell any assets. Then about 144 months, not including future growth of those assets before they’re sold. But then I’m broke at nearly 50.

Buy into a broad market tracking ETF (something that tracks s&P 500 or 1000 or similar). That way you’re not betting on individual companies, your betting on the collective largest companies in the world doing well. Over a long period of time, which for over a century has averaged ~7% inflation adjusted return yearly.

I fell like whatever alternative timeline you’re pulling them from, at least few could have been born on a different day.

Counting your primary residence and your ownership of a multi trillion dollar international corporation are different things entirely.

The richest people in world don’t feel guilt.

That’s a DeBeers diamond cartel propaganda rule of thumb.

Sure. But being out of debt is different from being financially independent.

Hundreds?

That’s enough for like 1.5 households to retire on. That’s it. A million is not as much as it used to be.

I apparently have the uncanny ability of being able to sense when I am drowsy. Call up the X-Men

Not school/mass shootings, no.

Shootings in general, yes.

The limit isn’t on the actual count of people, it’s likely the size of the chat user id number.

I didn’t think he’s smart enough, nor remotely trustworthy, for his opinion to matter here.

Interesting that the guy most likely to be on that list being in charge of those two agencies which determined that…