• WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Then free speech also means banning, or at least strictly limiting, corporate political contributions.

    This anti-distortion rationale for government speech regulation used to be central to the First Amendment, especially in campaign-finance cases, until the Supreme Court rejected it when striking down corporate campaign-contribution limits in Citizens United v. FEC.

    But of course that counts for nothing, since the Supreme Court is a wholly owned tool of the plutocratic oligarchy.