- cross-posted to:
- electionlawblog@rss.ponder.cat
- cross-posted to:
- electionlawblog@rss.ponder.cat
You must log in or register to comment.
Then free speech also means banning, or at least strictly limiting, corporate political contributions.
This anti-distortion rationale for government speech regulation used to be central to the First Amendment, especially in campaign-finance cases, until the Supreme Court rejected it when striking down corporate campaign-contribution limits in Citizens United v. FEC.
But of course that counts for nothing, since the Supreme Court is a wholly owned tool of the plutocratic oligarchy.