Then free speech also means banning, or at least strictly limiting, corporate political contributions.
This anti-distortion rationale for government speech regulation used to be central to the First Amendment, especially in campaign-finance cases, until the Supreme Court rejected it when striking down corporate campaign-contribution limits in Citizens United v. FEC.
But of course that counts for nothing, since the Supreme Court is a wholly owned tool of the plutocratic oligarchy.
Then free speech also means banning, or at least strictly limiting, corporate political contributions.
But of course that counts for nothing, since the Supreme Court is a wholly owned tool of the plutocratic oligarchy.