• kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Erm akshurally its not called Fascism, its called Fascism Lite™ and it’s totally different. Also its not called genocide its called protecting our allies and upholding international law 🤓

  • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Y’know… If I were just a liiittle bit more paranoid, this would start looking like it’s all planned out. Make the other guy so bad that people will basically have to choose between ‘mild’ genocide and a complete lunatic who wants to create a Theo-Fascistic Middle Ages kingdom.

    I’m honestly not chipping into the debate, firstly because this particular moral quandary is a Kobayashi Maru type deal, secondly because I’m not American so it’s not my place. Just random thoughts…

  • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not to excuse the fault the democrats and especially Biden has on the situation in Gaza, but “don’t both sides” this shit.

    Not only is “but Trump” an actual valid argument for about a million issues, Trump would absolutely steamroll the genocide in Gaza to even worse metrics. So not even in that 1 metric are the republicans a better option

  • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    You act like the US political system hasn’t been a choice between the lesser of two evils for many decades.

    Sure, Harris’s stance on the issue isn’t ideal, but Trump’s solution is to nuke Gaza.