Israel’s military has said it was highly likely its troops fired the shot that killed Ayşenur Ezgi Eygi, the American-Turkish woman killed at a protest in the occupied West Bank.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said her death was unintentional and expressed deep regret.

The statement came as Antony Blinken, the US secretary of state, called the killing of the 26-year-old last week “unprovoked and unjustified”.

Speaking on a diplomatic visit to London, Blinken told journalists that Eygi’s death showed the Israeli security forces needed to make fundamental changes to their rules of engagement.

MBFC
Archive

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    “Yeah, we killed her. We’d killher again if we could. Whatcha gonna do about it?”

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The Biden-Harris administration will say they are troubled and then provide $3 billion more to Israel.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            The sad truth is, give us someone who does. Who stands a chance. Then and only then will that discussion matter. Till then, not making things abjectly worse is sadly the best option. And we can push to improve from there. As opposed to trying to push to improve from a worse position in 4 years time.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              Who stands a chance.

              First they came for the Palestinians and I said nothing, because I didn’t want to ruin anyone’s electoral chances.

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                First of all its ghoulishly disingenuous for you to conflate providing arms. Which is wrong I’m not justifying that. To actually killing people. That’s straight up empty virtue signaling and not solving or convincing anyone of anything.

                I asked who stands a chance. And you quoted it without even answering it. Useless. Right now the only viable option other than R or D in the presidential campaign is a widespread general uprising. Which I’m all for. If you got one let’s go kiddo. But I got news for you. If you don’t. What you’re doing is empty virtue signaling that only helps the worst people around. And makes enemies of possible allies. Which is how I know your words are empty.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  I asked who stands a chance.

                  The people who collect the most corporate PAC money, obviously. So these are the only people it is reasonable to support.

  • zeephirus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    what they said was. we didnt mean to murder that one. it was one of the other unarmed protesters we meant to murder. The other one was only Palestinian so chill… they dont matter remember!

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Pretty much they mean “we say sorry if you keep letting us do it”.

      Now they will know if they can get away with it and subsequently kill more international peace activists to push the remaining ones out, so they can go back to murdering Palestinians without holding back.