Elon needs to get his fucking teeth kicked in.
Is this advocating for violence? If so id like to ask a mod why rules are being applied unequally?
Why are you defending rape?
Im simply asking why advocating for violence is ok sometimes and not others. This has got literally nothing to do with musk or whatever he tweated.
Bullshit. You’re suggesting that it isn’t justified to defend people against rapists. Quit JAQing off in public.
You are disgusting.
I don’t think the original intention was to imply rape. I think it was something like “I know you’ve been begging and hoping for someone to put a baby in you and fine I’ll do it”. Which is disgusting but not really on the level of rape.
Has Tailor been begging for a baby?
Or does Musk think the only reason women exist is to pop out babies, so Taylor must want a baby by default and Musk is willing to do so?
Because if it is the last, then it does imply rape.
I think it’s implying that Taylor secretly wants it and would consent to it and want it when “given the chance” of being impregnated by Musk. Not that he would forcibly do it.
So no rape, but a weird fantasy from Musk.
‘She wanted it’ is the excuse of rapists and their apologists.
You are treating this as if it was actual thing that happened or even would happen. This is just fantasy shit from a weirdo. In that fantasy, Tay-Tay is totally willing. The fantasy isn’t about raping her but her actually wanting to have his kids.
If you are in proximity to this fuck and aren’t hitting him in the face then you’re not only a class traitor, but you’re a traitor to humanity.
And if you get on a jury over someone hitting him, you need to nullify.
Is this advocating for violence? If so id like to ask a mod why rules are being applied unequally?
Fuck off we don’t like you
Well, you know, let’s be clear about something here. This person you’re talking about? Not a good person. Toxic, actually. And you can tell, because, much like the lobsters, we have these dominance hierarchies, right? We can perceive when someone’s behaving badly—when they’re undermining trust, or poisoning the environment around them. And that’s what toxicity is, fundamentally. It’s disruptive. And what do lobsters do with disruptive behavior in their hierarchy? They push back, hard. They establish boundaries. And you should, too.*
Well, I banned that motherfucker just now, and let me tell you, there’s a difference this time. All of my other bans? They were temporary, even tongue-in-cheek. But this one? This one is serious. You have to know when to draw the line. It’s like lobsters—they engage in these dominance battles, and sometimes, you need to make a decisive move to protect the integrity of the social structure. There’s no room for ambiguity when someone is undermining the whole system.
